If you're tired of enduring painful waxing sessions that leave behind stubborn hairs, suffering cuts from sharp razors, or dealing with the unpleasant scents of depilatory creams, it may be time to explore some long-lasting hair removal options. While laser hair removal is one effective method, its steep cost often makes it impractical for full-body treatment. Fortunately, IPL (Intense Pulsed Light) hair removal devices have emerged as a viable alternative, offering the potential to replace traditional methods.
The challenge, however, lies in selecting the right IPL device, especially given that there are over 100 options available on the market. In this article, we will compare two of the leading devices: the Silk’n Infinity IPL hair removal device and the Philips Lumea IPL hair removal device.
Silk’n Infinity vs. Philips Lumea
1. Design and Shape: Winner – A Tie
Both devices are designed for comfortable handling and a secure grip, yet their shapes are distinctively unique. The Silk’n Infinity IPL is a compact handheld device that fits comfortably in your palm. In contrast, the Philips Lumea boasts a gun-shaped structure with a smaller handle, facilitating a firm grip. Additionally, the Silk’n Infinity requires a power cord for operation, while the Philips Lumea offers the flexibility of both cordless and corded use.
Considering all factors, the Philips Lumea’s slip-resistant design and cordless capability are commendable features. However, its rechargeable battery adds weight, which can make prolonged use cumbersome. Therefore, in terms of ease of use, Silk’n Infinity takes the lead.
2. Intensity Levels: Winner – Philips Lumea
Both the Philips Lumea and Silk’n Infinity Prestige come equipped with five adjustable power levels, a standard feature among IPL devices. These levels cater to various areas of the body and face, addressing different hair removal needs. Users can select intensity levels manually, with Philips incorporating a +/- sign for adjustments, while Silk’n Infinity utilizes its power button for this purpose.
Furthermore, the Philips Lumea is accompanied by three treatment heads that enhance its customization capabilities, a feature that Silk’n Infinity lacks. Thus, in this category, Philips Lumea emerges as the winner.
3. Number of Flashes and Lifespan: Winner – Silk’n Infinity
When evaluating IPL devices, the number of flashes is a critical consideration. The Silk’n Infinity IPL device boasts an infinite number of flashes, allowing for unlimited usage without the worry of depletion. Conversely, the Philips Lumea is limited to 450,000 flashes, which can last for over 30 years with proper usage.
Consequently, Silk’n Infinity stands out as the superior choice regarding lifespan. For a more in-depth analysis, consider reading about the differences between Philips Lumea Advanced and Prestige.
4. Effectiveness and Results: Winner – Philips
The Silk’n Infinity employs eHPL technology, combining IPL with galvanic energy to effectively remove hair at a deeper level as it glides smoothly over the skin. Users can expect to utilize Silk’n Infinity every one to two weeks, with results typically observable within approximately 12 weeks; however, some individuals may experience a longer wait for visible outcomes.
In contrast, the Philips Lumea delivers effective results with treatments recommended every two weeks, usually requiring around two months to notice changes. Additionally, Silk’n Infinity offers shorter treatment times compared to Philips. Nonetheless, Philips Lumea generally demonstrates superior results across a broader range of users, making it the overall winner in effectiveness.
5. Safety and User Experience: Winner – Philips
Both devices are suitable for full-body use; however, users may experience some discomfort or mild pain during treatment. The added weight of the Philips Lumea may contribute to this discomfort. In terms of safety, the Silk’n Infinity holds FDA clearance, attesting to its clinically proven safety and efficacy. While Philips is clinically validated as safe, it has not yet received FDA clearance.
Nonetheless, Philips Lumea incorporates multiple safety features, including an integrated system to prevent accidental flashing, senselQ technology to detect appropriate skin tones, and SmartSkin Sensors to adjust intensity levels.
6. Customer Reviews and Ratings
While the manufacturer’s claims about a hair removal device are essential, real-world performance is crucial. The Silk’n Infinity has garnered an average rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, with a mix of reviews leaning positively. One customer noted:
“Initially, I was disappointed due to a blinking error with the unit, and the vendor did not respond to my requests for help. However, after some time, the device resumed normal operation, and I haven’t encountered any problems since. This method is a convenient and gentle way to reduce hair growth, requiring patience and discipline to see results. If you're keen to avoid the high costs of salon treatments, it's worth considering.”
On the other hand, customer feedback for Philips is notably better, achieving a 4.4 out of 5-star rating. A user shared:
“I’ve been using mine every two weeks for four sessions, and the majority of my leg hair is gone—only the occasional straggler remains that I can only spot by examining closely. While my armpits and bikini area are progressing slower, noticeable improvements are evident.”
7. Price: Winner – Silk’n Infinity
The Silk’n Infinity is priced at $429 and includes a charging cable, the IPL device, and an exclusive disinfection stand featuring antibacterial blue light. Meanwhile, the Philips Lumea is priced at $439, offering comparable value but with the addition of three attachment heads and a free travel adapter for convenience.
A Third Option: Ulike Sapphire Air3 IPL Hair Removal Handset
If neither of the previously mentioned devices suits your needs, consider the Ulike Sapphire Air3 IPL Hair Removal Device.
1. Design
In contrast to the heavier Philips design and the potentially slippery Silk’n Infinity, the Ulike Air3 boasts a lightweight, ergonomic build that is easy to handle without causing fatigue and remains securely in your grip. This corded device is available in three stylish colors.
2. Intensity and Energy Output
The Ulike features three intensity levels; however, its energy output is approximately three times greater than that of the other two devices. With a power output of 21 J/cm², Ulike effectively manages comfort through three distinct modes.
3. Price and Lifespan
Compared to devices priced over $400, Ulike is more budget-friendly. The package includes a shaving razor, a leather case, and UV protective glasses. Additionally, its robust construction and unlimited flashes contribute to its longevity, ensuring excellent value.
