When consumers find themselves faced with two devices that deliver similar functions and promise the same outcomes, confusion often arises regarding which one to choose. This scenario applies to both The Noodist Kit and Silk’n hair removal systems, as both products represent premium options for the long-lasting removal of unwanted hair.
Both devices harness light technology to eliminate undesired hair and fall within a comparable price range. However, the specific type of light utilized and the overall effectiveness of each device exhibit some notable differences. For example, The Nood employs Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), while Silk’n uses Home Pulsed Light (HPL) in conjunction with Galvanic Energy to reach its hair removal goals.
Are you already feeling overwhelmed by terms like IPL and HPL? Let’s take a moment to clarify what each acronym means and how it influences the performance of these hair removal devices.
Understanding Intense Pulsed Light (IPL)
Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) refers to a broad spectrum of high-wavelength lights, often characterized as polychromatic due to their multiple colors. Devices equipped with IPL technology emit flashes of light to the skin, specifically targeting melanin, which is responsible for pigment production. When the light reaches the melanin, it typically causes the hair follicles to enter a resting phase, leading to hair loss. Generally speaking, the greater the intensity of the light, the quicker the hair removal process occurs.
Exploring Home Pulsed Light (HPL)
More commonly recognized as Silk’n Infinity’s eHPL™, Home Pulsed Light (HPL) is an advanced iteration of IPL technology developed by Silk’n. This technology operates similarly to IPL, allowing users to emit light pulses with their devices to eliminate unwanted hair.
The key distinction lies in the fact that the Silk’n handset can be glided over the skin for a more efficient treatment experience. Moreover, in addition to its optical eHPL energy, Silk’n incorporates galvanic energy, which opens the pores for quicker light penetration and enhanced effectiveness.
Nood vs. Silk’n: Which Device Is Right for You?
To determine which of these two hair removal devices is superior, we must examine the features and effectiveness of each, bearing in mind your personal preferences and skin type. Here’s a comparative analysis based on various characteristics.
Design and Aesthetics: Winner – The Noodist Kit
The Noodist Kit’s IPL Flasher 2.0 features an almost straight design, with a slightly wider body near the cap for a comfortable grip. Its lightweight nature makes it easy to handle during prolonged use. The device's broader section showcases a round area that displays operational parameters digitally.
Below the digital display lies the push button, conveniently accessible for engagement with a thumb or index finger. The color scheme harmonizes white, black, and gold, lending the handset a sophisticated appearance.
In comparison, the Silk’n device is relatively broader and shorter, often perceived as less ergonomic than its Nood counterpart. Additionally, it lacks a digital display; the flash button is the only prominent feature. Those with a critical eye for design may find the white-and-black color scheme of Silk’n less appealing compared to Nood’s elegant combination.
Bottom Line: While design may not be the foremost consideration for every buyer, it is essential to recognize that The Noodist Kit excels in this category compared to Silk’n.
Innovative Features: Winner – Silk’n
Silk’n differentiates itself from its competitors, particularly those utilizing IPL technology, in two significant ways. First, it includes a complimentary app that assists users in scheduling their treatments, ensuring they won’t overlook their next session. Second, the device allows for a gliding motion, combining pulsing and gliding light, which expedites treatment and facilitates access to harder-to-reach areas.
Conversely, the Noodist Kit only permits pulsed light and does not offer an app for tracking treatment schedules. Users who forget their next appointment may experience extended wait times before seeing results.
Bottom Line: Silk’n clearly leads in cutting-edge innovation, which could greatly enhance your overall satisfaction with the device.
Effectiveness and Results: Winner – The Noodist Kit
Both devices come equipped with five intensity levels, ranging from one (highest) to five (lowest). They also exhibit selectivity concerning the hair and skin types on which they can be used effectively. Nevertheless, Nood's package edges out Silk’n by including pre- and post-treatment products that further improve the results.
The Noodist Kit features an exfoliant known as The Reviver, which eliminates dirt and dead skin from the pores, enabling the pulsed light to reach hair follicles more swiftly. With two 3.3 oz. bottles, users can apply this product twice a week for a month. Additionally, Nood provides an Aloe-based moisturizer infused with chamomile and lavender extracts, soothing the skin and minimizing redness or irritation.
On the other hand, Silk’n lacks both an exfoliating product and a post-treatment soothing cream. While it does incorporate galvanic treatment to enlarge the pores for quicker light penetration, it does not match the comprehensive care offered by Nood.
In terms of effectiveness, Silk’n does not provide a specific timeline for users to expect results but recommends weekly use for optimal results. By contrast, The Noodist Kit users can anticipate a significant reduction in body hair within eight weeks.
Bottom Line: The Noodist Kit offers a more holistic approach to hair removal than Silk’n, focusing not only on hair elimination but also on maintaining healthy, radiant skin.
Value for Money: Winner – The Noodist Kit
The Noodist Kit is priced at $473, while Silk’n retails for $429. Both brands include free shipping within the US and a 90-day money-back guarantee, although Silk’n offers only a 30-day guarantee.
Despite the Noodist Kit being $44 more expensive, the additional features and benefits justify the price difference. If you are willing to invest in Silk’n, which lacks exfoliation and moisturizing products, you might as well opt for the more comprehensive Noodist Kit.
Bottom Line: While The Noodist Kit carries a higher price tag than Silk’n, it delivers greater functionality and value for the extra cost.
Time to Complete Treatment: Winner – Silk’n
The Silk’n handset, being broader at the cap compared to Nood’s flasher, can cover larger areas more efficiently. Furthermore, its gliding capability allows for quicker treatment sessions, particularly for larger body parts such as legs.
Bottom Line: If you lead a busy lifestyle and seek a device that provides rapid coverage
