Case description
A 25-year-old white woman, A.G., presents to a family practice clinic seeking a levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD) for contraception. She has only used condoms in the past, but A.G. recently became engaged and wants to avoid pregnancy for several more years while she completes her master’s degree. Her medical history is noncontributory; she has no known allergies, is a non-smoker, uses no illicit drugs, and has minimal alcohol intake. She takes a daily multivitamin.
Further history reveals that since puberty A.G. has experienced increased growth of facial hair. It has caused considerable embarrassment for her, and she is reluctant to discuss this issue with her physician. She also has mild acne, but has not tried any prescription therapies. She has heard from friends that contraceptive pills cause increased growth of facial hair, and for this reason she has never used any birth control medication. She has regular monthly menses.
Examination
Examination findingsdark facial hair
The patient is counseled about the causes of hirsutism and agrees to further investigation. She is given a requisition for measurement of complete blood count; thyroid-stimulating hormone, fasting plasma glucose, and lipid levels; a renal panel; and free testosterone, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) levels. A pelvic ultrasound is ordered as well, and A.G. is asked to follow up in 2 weeks, at which time a suitable contraceptive method will be discussed.
Diagnostic approach
Androgen-excess disorders
-
polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)—clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenism in addition to ovarian dysfunction or polycystic ovary morphology;
-
idiopathic hyperandrogenism—clinical and biochemical hyperandrogenism but regular ovulatory cycles of normal length and normal ovary morphology;
-
idiopathic hirsutism—hirsutism with normal androgen concentrations, ovulatory cycles, and ovary morphology;
-
nonclassic congenital adrenal hyperplasia;
-
androgen-secreting tumours; and
-
iatrogenic excess androgen.
Hirsutism should be investigated and treated, not only to determine the underlying cause, but also because it can negatively affect women’s psychological well-being.
A detailed history and physical examination are most valuable when determining the cause of hirsutism. Methods for evaluation can be subjective and objective. Visually scoring the body and facial terminal hair growth in specified body areas using the Ferriman-Gallwey score is more convenient and less expensive than more objective scoring with photographic evaluations, microscopic measurements, and weighing of shaved or plucked hair. The Ferriman-Gallwey tool scores 9 of the 11 androgen-sensitive hair growth areas on a scale of 0 to 4 (for a maximum score of 36). A score of 8 to 15 is considered mild hirsutism; a score above 15 is considered moderate to severe hirsutism.1
Determination of serum androgen levels should be the first step for establishing the cause of hirsutism. Androgen contributes to the growth of sexual hair in both sexes, as well as to the growth of facial and trunk hair in women with hirsutism. The androgens found in female serum include DHEA-S, DHEA, androstenedione, testosterone, and dihydrotestosterone. The most active androgen, dihydrotestosterone, has low serum levels because it is synthesized in androgen target tissues. For this reason, measurable circulating androgen levels might not reflect androgen activity in the hair follicles of women with hirsutism. Serum levels of DHEA-S and free testosterone are the most sensitive measurements of androgen excess and are considered tumour markers.2,3
If PCOS is suspected, a metabolic evaluation (measurement of plasma glucose levels, waist circumference and body mass index, complete lipid profile, and blood pressure) is necessary to evaluate the patient’s risk of metabolic and cardiovascular dysfunction. A common finding in PCOS is an increased luteinizing hormone to follicle-stimulating hormone ratio (> 2.5). Ultrasound might aid in diagnosing PCOS, as well as nonclassic congenital adrenal hyperplasia or androgen-secreting tumours.
Management of hirsutism
An approach to treatment of hirsutism is outlined in Figure 1.1,2,4
- Download figure
- Open in new tab
Figure 1
Management of idiopathic hirsutism
OCP—oral contraceptive pill, PCOS—polycystic ovary syndrome.
Adapted from Hirsutism.com,1 Escobar-Morreale et al,2 and Harrison et al.4
Rule out potential drug-related causes
Drugsexcessive hair growth
Nonpharmacologic intervention
Targeted counseling about self-image plays an important role in the treatment of hirsutism. Lifestyle modifications, such as physical exercise and dietary advice, can be recommended. Such modifications might be less effective for idiopathic hirsutism than for hirsutism caused by PCOS; however, they might also be worthwhile for cardiovascular protection.2 Cosmetic measures, such as bleaching, plucking, shaving, waxing, chemical treatment, electrolysis, laser hair removal, and intense pulsed light are usually effective in controlling mild hirsutism, especially when terminal hair localizes in exposed areas such as the face.
Pharmacologic intervention
When hirsutism is cosmetically distressing, moderate to severe, or widespread, a pharmacologic treatment should be offered. As drugs are only partially effective on terminal hairs, management of clinically important hirsutism is based on a dual approach: pharmacologic therapy to reduce androgen secretion and action, and the physical removal of terminal hair already present.2
Drug treatment is limited to patients with hirsutism who do not wish to become pregnant in the short term (Figure 1).1,2,4 Oral contraceptives, topical eflornithine, and antiandrogens are common medications used to treat hirsutism4–11 (Table 1).1–8,12–26
- View inline
- View popup
Table 1
Medications used for idiopathic hirsutism1–8: Medications listed are contraindicated in pregnancy and require use of appropriate contraception.
Bringing evidence to practice
Topical 13.9% eflornithine cream is used as monotherapy for mild facial hirsutism or as an adjunct to other pharmacologic therapies along with nonpharmacologic measures.2
The complex interplay of estrogens and progestins contributes to the variable effects of OCPs on hirsutism. Low-dose OCPs containing a neutral (low-androgenicity) progestin, such as desogestrel and norgestimate, or an antiandrogen, such as cyproterone acetate and the spironolactone derivative drospirenone, are considered first-line therapy for hirsutism.
-
In a randomized clinical trial of healthy women of childbearing age, 45 women received a third-generation OCP (30 μg ethinyl estradiol plus 150 μg desogestrel) and 46 received a second-generation OCP (30 μg ethinyl estradiol plus 150 μg levonorgestrel). After 6 months of therapy, the group taking the third-generation OCP had significant reduction in the severity of hirsutism and acne without significant weight change compared with those taking the second-generation OCP (P < .001).27
-
Other “contraceptives” that contain cyproterone acetate (eg, Diane-35 and CyEstra-35, which are not officially indicated for contraception in Canada) or drospirenone (eg, Yasmin, Yaz) have similar efficacy in treating hirsutism.19 There is also some weak, indirect evidence suggesting that they might be slightly more effective than OCPs with neutral progestins.18,28
Antiandrogens such as spironolactone, cyproterone acetate, finasteride, and flutamide are recommended for patients with moderate to severe hirsutism. The various antiandrogens have similar efficacy with variations in side effects. Spironolactone, cyproterone acetate, or finasteride are preferred over flutamide because of the increased risk of severe or fatal liver toxicity with flutamide.2,24
Other drugs that have been reported to have been used for hirsutism include metformin, prednisone, ketoconazole, and gonadotropin-releasing agonists. These medications are not often recommended for idiopathic hirsutism because their effects are generally limited, they cause adverse effects, or they are more expensive. However, they do have a role in hirsutism with other specific causes,2,3 as outlined in the chart available from CFPlus.*
Case resolution
The patient, A.G., is seen at her scheduled follow-up appointment. All laboratory test results are normal and the pelvic ultrasound has not revealed any abnormalities, and A.G. is diagnosed with idiopathic hirsutism. Both contraceptive and hirsutism treatment options are discussed with her. She declines oral treatment, stating that her schedule is hectic and that she will likely forget to take the birth control pill on a regular basis, risking unplanned pregnancy.
Mirena (levonorgestrel-releasing IUD) does not increase or decrease the amount of facial hair in women with idiopathic hirsutism. After considering this information and based on her preference, A.G. decides to proceed with the insertion of the IUD. She is advised to consider cosmetic measures such as bleaching, plucking, waxing, shaving, electrolysis, or laser therapy.
Three months later, A.G.’s facial hair remains unchanged and she wishes to explore additional therapy. A combination of eflornithine cream and laser therapy has been shown to remove unwanted hair on the upper lip of women significantly better than laser therapy alone for up to 6 months (P = .021).12 Thus, A.G. agrees to a trial of eflornithine cream and decides to explore laser therapy options. A switch from Mirena to a drospirenone-containing OCP is also discussed as a future option.
Footnotes
-
↵* The full version of the RxFiles chart on the treatment of hirsutism is available at www.cfp.ca. Go to the full text of the article online and click on CFPlus in the menu at the top right-hand side of the page.
-
Competing interests
RxFiles and contributing authors do not have any commercial competing interests. RxFiles Academic Detailing Program is funded through a grant from Saskatchewan Health to Saskatoon Health Region; additional “not for profit; not for loss” revenue is obtained from sales of books and online subscriptions.
- Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada
References
- ↵
- Hirsutism.com [website]
- ↵
- Escobar-Morreale HF,
- Carmina E,
- Dewailly D,
- Gambineri A,
- Kelestimur F,
- Moghetti P,
- et al
- ↵
- DynaMed [Internet database]
- ↵
- Harrison S,
- Somani N,
- Bergfeld WF
- ↵
- Hirsutism.info [website]
- ↵
- Rosenfield RL
-
- Canadian Pharmacists Association
- ↵DRUGDEX Gateway. Greenwood Village, CO: Thomson Micromedex; 2002. Available from: www.thomsonhc.com. Accessed 2011 Dec 6.Google Scholar
-
- Kumar R,
- St John J,
- Devendra D
-
- Sathyapalan T,
- Atkin SL
- ↵
- Koulouri O,
- Conway GS
- ↵
- Hamzavi I,
- Tan E,
- Shapiro J,
- Lui H
-
- Smith SR,
- Piacquadio DJ,
- Beger B,
- Littler C
-
- Wolf JE Jr.,
- Shander D,
- Huber F,
- Jackson J,
- Lin CS,
- Mathes BM,
- et al
-
- Regier L,
- Downey S
-
- Health Canada
-
- Bunka D
- ↵
- Batukan C,
- Muderris II
- ↵
- Batukan C,
- Muderris II,
- Ozcelik B,
- Ozturk A
-
- Brown J,
- Farquhar C,
- Lee O,
- Toomath R,
- Jepson RG
- ↵
- Swiglo BA,
- Cosma M,
- Flynn DN,
- Kurtz DM,
- Labella ML,
- Mullan RJ,
- et al
-
- Karakurt F,
- Sahin I,
- Güler S,
- Demirbas B,
- Culha C,
- Serter R,
- et al
-
- Van der Spuy ZM,
- Le Roux PA
- ↵
- Brahm J,
- Brahm M,
- Segovia R,
- Latorre R,
- Zapata R,
- Poniachik J,
- et al
-
- Calaf J,
- López E,
- Millet A,
- Alcañiz J,
- Fortuny A,
- Vidal O,
- et al
- ↵
- Cosma M,
- Swiglo BA,
- Flynn DN,
- Kurtz DM,
- LaBella ML,
- Mullan RJ,
- et al
- ↵
- Sanam M,
- Ziba O
- ↵
- Breitkopf DM,
- Rosen MP,
- Young SL,
- Nagamani M
Abstract
Objective To determine if screening of infants for anemia at 9 months in the Cree region of Quebec should continue, by comparing the prevalence of anemia in the initial years of screening (1995 to 2000) with prevalence data from infants screened between 2002 and 2007.
Design Comparison of anemia prevalence from 2 cross-sectional surveys. Nonoverlapping 95% CIs were used to determine if results were significantly different.
Setting Nine Quebec Cree communities.
Participants Infants screened for anemia between 1995 and 2000 (n = 716) or 2002 and 2007 (n = 1325).
Main outcome measures Anemia was diagnosed based on hemoglobin concentration. An erythrocyte mean cell volume of less than 71 fL was used as a proxy for iron deficiency.
Results Hemoglobin concentration among infants screened from 2002 to 2007 was, on average, 7 g/L greater than among infants screened from 1995 to 2000 (mean [standard deviation] 121 [11] g/L vs 114 [11] g/L). The prevalence of anemia (hemoglobin < 110 g/L) from 1995 to 2000 was 31.7% (95% CI 28.3% to 35.1%), but from 2002 to 2007 it was significantly lower at 12.5% (95% CI 10.7% to 14.2%). Using a hemoglobin concentration more specific to iron deficiency anemia (IDA) (hemoglobin < 100 g/L), from 1995 to 2000 7.5% (95% CI 5.6% to 9.4%) of infants had IDA, whereas from 2002 to 2007 only 2.0% (95% CI 1.2% to 2.8%) had IDA. The prevalence of iron deficiency based on mean cell volume declined from 18.3% (95% CI 15.5% to 21.1%) from 1995 to 2000 to 4.2% (95% CI 3.1% to 5.3%) from 2002 to 2007.
Conclusion The 12.5% prevalence of anemia (hemoglobin < 110 g/L) among Cree infants from 2002 to 2007 was much lower than the prevalence from 1995 to 2000 but somewhat higher than among nonaboriginal infants (8.0%). The low anemia prevalence among Quebec Cree infants after 2002 suggests that replacing universal screening with targeted screening of higher-risk infants needs to be considered following studies to identify risk factors for anemia.
Early childhood is a period of rapid growth with high iron requirements; consequently, iron deficiency (ID) is the most prevalent nutrition problem among infants.1 Iron deficiency resulting in anemia in infancy is associated with impaired neurodevelopment and potentially irreversible changes in brain structure and function.2 Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a serious concern among aboriginal children in Canada and the United States.3,4 Dietary risk factors for anemia in aboriginal infants include bottle feeding with low-iron formula or cow’s milk, the absence of iron-rich complementary foods after 6 months of age, and prolonged exclusive breastfeeding past 6 months of age.5–9
Given the psychomotor impairment, cognitive delay, and behavioural disturbances that can result from IDA, in 1994 the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care recommended routine measurement of hemoglobin (Hb) concentration among aboriginal infants between 6 and 12 months of age—optimally at 9 months10—yet anemia screening is not routinely performed in many aboriginal communities.11 Universal screening occurs in the Inuit communities of Nunavik and Nunavut (Dr Johanne Morel, e-mail communication, November 15, 2010) and in the Cree region of Quebec, where in 1995 the Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay in Chisasibi, Que, instituted an anemia screening protocol for 9-month-old infants.
From 1995 to 2000, anemia prevalence among Cree infants in Quebec was 25% to 32%.7 A total of 22.7% had ID (serum ferritin < 10 μg/L) and 7.9% had IDA (Hb < 110 g/L and serum ferritin < 10 μg/L).12 Factors associated with anemia in cross-sectional studies were cow’s milk feeding, breastfeeding at the time of screening, suboptimal vitamin A status, chronic infections, lead exposure,7 and maternal anemia.13 The association between breastfeeding and anemia was likely owing to insufficient iron-rich complementary foods in infants’ diets; in 1 Cree community, 56% of infants aged 7 to 10 months were estimated to consume inadequate dietary iron14 and, among infants screened for anemia, only 15.1% ate meat daily and 28.5% never ate meat.7
Given the heightened awareness about infant anemia that results from screening, the condition is reviewed by health care professionals with infants’ caregivers through the Maternal and Child Health Program checklists and materials. As part of the regional Maternal and Child Health Program, the anemia screening protocol continued in 2011 and parents who attended well-baby clinics with their infants were advised about healthy eating and the appropriate diet for infants to prevent IDA. The aim of the current study was to document if anemia prevalence and ID had declined among Cree infants since screening was initiated in 1995. The results would help the Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay to decide whether to continue anemia screening. The data would also be useful in considering if the recommendation to universally screen aboriginal infants for anemia should be maintained.
METHODS
In the Cree region of Quebec, a complete blood count (CBC) to screen for anemia is done in community clinics at an infant’s 9-month well-baby appointment. The screening protocol was initiated in 1995 and continues to the present day. Screening occurs at the 12-month appointment if the infant has a fever or infection at the 9-month appointment, or if the appointment is missed at 9 months.
Laboratory results from anemia screening were in 2 separate databases. One database contained Hb concentration and erythrocyte mean cell volume (MCV) values collected by reviewing medical charts of infants screened for anemia from January 1995 to February 2000. The other database was a computerized download from the regional central laboratories, and included the Hb concentration and erythrocyte MCV of infants who had CBC evaluations from September 2002 to November 2007. The 2 databases were analyzed independently. Infants with test results before 8 months of age, after 12 months of age, or from the hospital ward or walk-in clinic setting were excluded from analysis.
Three Hb concentrations were used to estimate anemia prevalence in infants: a 110 g/L cutoff recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for infants 6 to 12 months of age15; a 105 g/L cutoff that eliminates cases of “statistical anemia”16; and a 100 g/L cutoff more specific to IDA in 9-month-old breastfed infants.17 Erythrocytes less than 71 fL in size were considered evidence of low iron stores, and therefore evidence of ID.17
Descriptive statistics were reported as means and standard deviations or means and 95% CIs. Because the anemia screening data from 1995 to 2000 and 2002 to 2007 were in separate databases, nonoverlapping 95% CIs were used to determine if results were different between the 2 time periods. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 17.0.
Ethics
The Directors of Professional Services of the hospital laboratories authorized the release of the electronic databases. The Research Committee of the Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay and the Health Research Ethics Boards, Panel B and PER/ ALES/NS, at the University of Alberta gave approval for analysis of data.
RESULTS
The database containing anemia screening data for the years 1995 to 2000 included information for 716 infants, representing 66% of infants who were eligible for screening in that time period. The database for the years 2002 to 2007 included information for 1325 infants who had CBC results, representing 76% of infants who were eligible for screening in that time period. Anemia prevalence, Hb concentration, and MCV for each time period are reported in Table 1. Mean Hb concentration from 2002 to 2007 was 7 g/L greater than that from 1995 to 2000 (mean [standard deviation] 121 [11] g/L vs 114 [11] g/L) and mean erythrocyte MCV was greater by 3 fL from 2002 to 2007 than from 1995 to 2000 (mean [standard deviation] 78 [5] fL vs 75 [6] fL). The nonoverlapping CIs show that anemia prevalence defined using each of the 3 Hb cutoffs (110 g/L, 105 g/L, and 100 g/L) declined significantly between 1995 to 2000 and 2002 to 2007. The prevalence of ID (erythrocyte MCV < 71 fL) also declined significantly between the 2 time periods, according to the nonoverlapping 95% CIs.
- View inline
- View popup
Table 1
Anemia prevalence, ID prevalence, Hb concentration, and erythrocyte MCV of infants in the Cree region of Quebec who were screened for anemia during 2 separate periods (1995 to 2000 and 2002 to 2007)
DISCUSSION
Since screening for anemia was initiated in the Cree region of Quebec, the prevalences of anemia and ID have declined considerably. Using the WHO definition (Hb < 110 g/L),15 from 1995 to 2000 the prevalence of anemia was 31.7% whereas from 2002 to 2007 it was 12.5%. The appropriate cutoff to define infant anemia is a matter of debate, particularly considering that mild anemia is not specific for ID.17 Hemoglobin concentration of less than 100 g/L is more specific to IDA than Hb concentration of less than 110 g/L.17,18 Using the 100 g/L cutoff, 7.5% of infants had anemia from 1995 to 2000 whereas only 2.0% did from 2002 to 2007. A decline in ID is supported by a decrease in the prevalence of microcytic erythrocytes (MCV < 71 fL) from 18.3% to 4.2% between the 2 time periods.
The WHO estimates that half of all cases of anemia in children are caused by ID,19 so it is likely that the decrease in anemia in Cree infants was the result of increased dietary iron intake.20 This might have been the consequence of dietary counseling at well-baby clinics encouraging iron-rich complementary foods such as infant cereals and meats, and among bottle-fed infants the use of iron-fortified infant formula rather than cow’s milk. In addition, low-iron infant formula has been phased out by some companies since anemia screening was initiated in the 1990s.
Maternal iron sufficiency in pregnancy is important for ensuring infants’ normal hematologic development postpartum.21 Maternal anemia is associated with anemia in Cree infants,13 and in nonaboriginal infants in Canada and elsewhere.22,23 Thus, a reduction in maternal ID could result in lower anemia prevalence in infants. Chronic and acute infections suppress Hb concentrations in Inuit, First Nations, Alaska Native, Yupik, and Inupiat infants.5,24–26 A reduction in infections, or fewer infants with infections being screened for anemia as per protocol recommendations by the Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay, would likely contribute to a lower anemia prevalence.12
Recent data about anemia prevalence in aboriginal infants are sparse given that screening is inconsistent. One study done in northern Ontario and Nunavut from 2001 to 2003 included infants aged 4 to 18 months from 1 Inuit and 2 Cree communities. The 36% prevalence of anemia (Hb < 110 g/L)5 among these infants is almost triple the 12.5% prevalence of anemia (Hb < 110 g/L) in infants in the Cree region of Quebec from 2002 to 2007. The prevalence of anemia among Quebec Cree infants is only somewhat higher than the 8.0% prevalence of anemia (Hb < 110 g/L) among Canadian infants tested in the 1990s (the most recent prevalence data for infants in Canada).27
There is no recommendation to routinely screen the general population of Canadian infants for anemia, and it is unlikely that the systematic screening of Cree infants in Quebec would detect enough cases of IDA to make it a useful strategy. Potential harms include false-positive results, anxiety, and cost, as well as the small potential harms of treatment with oral iron.28 The US Preventive Services Task Force concluded in 2006 that evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against routine screening for IDA in asymptomatic children aged 6 to 12 months.28 Considering the pain, time, and expense of blood test screening for anemia in low-risk populations, such as Cree infants in northern Quebec, systematic screening of all infants could possibly be replaced by targeted screening aimed at early anemia detection in infants with risk factors for ID after 6 months of age. This is a more complicated approach than population screening, as it includes obtaining a health and dietary history of risk factors, such as prematurity, skin pallor, poor diet, chronic infections, and maternal anemia in pregnancy. In theory, this approach should reduce the total population of infants requiring screening to a much smaller one that contains most infants with anemia; however, the prevalence of the Cree infant population with 1 or more risk factors is unknown, meaning that a large proportion of infants might still be tested for anemia using targeted screening. Although it is possible that infants with more than 1 risk factor would be at higher risk of anemia than infants with a single risk factor, it is not clear which combination of risk factors would be the most specific to ID. Furthermore, the sensitivity of individual or multiple risk factors to detect mild or moderate anemia in infants can be low.29,30
Psychomotor impairment caused by ID can be irreversible despite iron therapy.2 Thus, the prevention of the neurodevelopmental consequences of IDA might require the prevention of ID rather than the detection and treatment of existing ID.28 Therefore, in Quebec Cree and other aboriginal communities there should be a focus on primary interventions for anemia prevention involving multiple health promotion activities that are mutually reinforcing. Strategies to improve the iron stores of newborns could include improving women’s access to nutritious foods before, during, and after pregnancy; encouraging pregnant women to take iron supplements; and delaying umbilical cord clamping at birth.1,31 Mothers should be encouraged to exclusively breastfeed their infants for 6 months, and to then provide sources of bioavailable iron such as meat and iron-fortified infant cereals.32–34 Iron-fortified cereals are expensive to purchase in remote communities13; however, wild meats, many of which were and continue to be part of traditional aboriginal infant feeding practices,5,11,35,36 might be more culturally appropriate, available, and economical than infant cereals. For this reason, the use of both cereals and iron-rich traditional meats should be encouraged. Although iron-fortified formula is an excellent vehicle for delivering iron and protecting aboriginal infants from anemia,6 suggesting that aboriginal women formula-feed as a means to prevent infant anemia is inappropriate considering formula’s high cost,13 absence of immunologic factors,35 association with excess weight gain in infancy,8 and potential to undermine breastfeeding.37 Although there are no data on anemia prevalence in young Cree children, the prevalence of anemia is 16.8% (95% CI 12.0% to 21.6%) in Inuit children 3 to 5 years old,36 indicating that optimizing nutrition and reducing infections must continue following infancy to prevent early childhood anemia.
Strengths and limitations
This is the first study to report a change in anemia prevalence in an aboriginal infant population where systematic anemia screening was maintained over a long period of time. A limitation of the study is the possibility of selection bias introduced by the large number of infants who were not screened, or that the percentage of eligible infants who were screened increased over time. We also did not have the data required to examine why anemia prevalence declined among Cree infants, such as information on dietary iron intake, infection prevalence, or maternal iron stores during each infant’s gestation.
Conclusion
The prevalence of anemia and ID declined among Cree infants in Quebec since the initiation of anemia screening in 1995. Based on the current low prevalence of anemia, primary prevention efforts for ID should be emphasized in Cree communities in addition to secondary prevention efforts through population or targeted screening. Nutrition education programs are required that consist of community-based communication strategies that promote a food-based approach to preventing ID and integrate local nutrition educators into well-baby care.14 In the Cree region of Quebec, further cohort studies to address variables affecting the prevalence of infant anemia should be considered to help identify patients who are the most vulnerable to anemia, and to document any future changes in anemia and ID prevalence.
Acknowledgments
Data collection was done in-house by the Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay or was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Dr Dannenbaum is employed by the Cree Health Board. We kindly thank Dr Kent Saylor, Dr Chip Phi, and Dr Johanne Morel for commenting on manuscript drafts. We acknowledge the support of the Iiyiyiuch and Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay. Drafts of this manuscript were reviewed by the Research Committee of the Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay.
Notes
EDITOR’S KEY POINTS
-
Since screening for anemia was initiated in the Cree region of Quebec, the prevalences of anemia and iron deficiency have declined considerably.
-
Based on the current low prevalence of anemia, primary prevention efforts for iron deficiency should be emphasized in Cree communities in addition to secondary prevention efforts through population or targeted screening.
-
To prevent iron deficiency, mothers should be encouraged to exclusively breastfeed their infants for 6 months, and to then provide sources of bioavailable iron such as meat and iron-fortified infant cereals. Wild meats might be more culturally appropriate, available, and economical than infant cereals.
POINTS DE REPÈRE DU RÉDACTEUR
-
Depuis qu’on a instauré un dépistage de l’anémie dans la région cri du Québec, la prévalence de l’anémie et de la déficience en fer a beaucoup diminué.
-
Étant donné la faible prévalence actuelle de l’anémie, on devrait concentrer les efforts sur la prévention primaire de la déficience en fer dans les communautés cris, mais aussi sur la prévention secondaire au moyen d’un dépistage universel ou ciblé.
-
Afin de prévenir la déficience en fer, les mères devraient être incitées à nourrir leurs nourrissons uniquement au sein pendant 6 mois, pour ensuite leur fournir des sources de fer bio-disponibles telles que la viande et les céréales pour nourrissons enrichies de fer. Les viandes sauvages pourraient être culturellement plus appropriées, plus disponibles et plus économiques que les céréales pour nourrissons.
Footnotes
-
Cet article a fait l’objet d’une révision par des pairs.
-
This article has been peer reviewed.
-
Contributors
Dr Willows analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. Dr Vadeboncoeur helped collect the data and reviewed copies of the manuscript. Dr Dannenbaum helped conceptualize the study, organized data collection, and made editorial changes to the manuscript.
-
Competing interests
None declared
- Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada
References
- ↵
- Lutter CK
- ↵
- Beard JL
- ↵
- Jamieson JA,
- Kuhnlein HV
- ↵
- Gessner BD
- ↵
- Christofides A,
- Schauer C,
- Zlotkin SH
- ↵
- Sawchuk P,
- Rauliuk M,
- Kotaska A,
- Townsend S,
- Wilson E,
- Starr M
- ↵
- Willows ND
- ↵
- Willows ND,
- Morel J,
- Gray-Donald K
- ↵
- Willows ND,
- Dewailly E,
- Gray-Donald K
- ↵
- Feightner JW
- ↵
- Christofides A,
- Schauer C,
- Zlotkin SH
- ↵
- Willows N,
- Gray-Donald K
- ↵
- Willows ND,
- Iserhoff R,
- Napash L,
- Leclerc L,
- Verrall T
- ↵
- Verrall T,
- Gray-Donald K
- ↵
- Michaelsen KF,
- Weaver L,
- Branca F,
- Robertson A
- ↵
- Dallman PR,
- Yip R,
- Oski FA
- ↵
- Domellöf M,
- Dewey KG,
- Lönnerdal B,
- Cohen RJ,
- Hernell O
- ↵
- Dewey KG,
- Cohen RJ,
- Rivera LL,
- Brown KH
- ↵
- World Health Organization
- ↵
- Stoltzfus RJ
- ↵
- Lubach GR,
- Coe CL
- ↵
- De Pee S,
- Bloem MW,
- Sari M,
- Kiess L,
- Yip R,
- Kosen S
- ↵
- Savoie N,
- Rioux FM
- ↵
- Cruz A,
- Parkinson AJ,
- Hall D,
- Bulkow L,
- Heyward W
-
- Willows ND,
- Gray-Donald K
- ↵
- Baggett HC,
- Parkinson AJ,
- Muth PT,
- Gold BD,
- Gessner BD
- ↵
- Zlotkin SH,
- Ste-Marie M,
- Kopelman H,
- Jones A,
- Adam J
- ↵
- US Preventive Services Task Force
- ↵
- Bogen DL,
- Duggan AK,
- Dover GJ,
- Wilson MH
- ↵
- Kapur D,
- Agarwal KN,
- Sharma S
- ↵
- Dewey KG,
- Chaparro CM
- ↵
- Krebs NF,
- Westcott JE,
- Butler N,
- Robinson C,
- Bell M,
- Hambidge KM
-
- Walter T,
- Dallman PR,
- Pizarro F,
- Velozo L,
- Peña G,
- Bartholmey SJ,
- et al
- ↵
- Ziegler EE,
- Nelson SE,
- Jeter JM
- ↵
- Monterrosa EC,
- Frongillo EA,
- Vásquez-Garibay EM,
- Romero-Velarde E,
- Casey LM,
- Willows ND
- ↵
- Pacey A,
- Weiler H,
- Egeland GM
- ↵
- Verrall T,
- Napash L,
- Leclerc L,
- Mercure S,
- Gray-Donald K