In today's society, excessive body hair that doesn't conform to contemporary beauty standards can be a significant issue for both men and women who wish to adhere to these norms. Unwanted body hair, particularly noticeable during the summer months, has made depilatory creams highly popular among beauty-conscious individuals. These chemical depilatories offer a safe, quick, inexpensive, and painless method for hair removal.
The most commonly used active ingredient in these creams is thioglycolate (calcium thioglycolate), with sulfides being used to a lesser extent. These chemicals work by breaking down the disulfide bonds, which are crucial for the stability of keratin in hair. This process chemically erodes the hair, making it brittle and soft until it dissolves, allowing for easy removal from the surface of the skin.
Many hair removal products also contain ingredients that inhibit hair growth, effectively slowing down the rate at which hair returns. The addition of alkaline substances serves to increase the pH level, thereby enhancing the efficacy of the product. In many countries, products containing arsenic and sulfides are increasingly used for hair removal. These substances are often misleadingly marketed as "natural" or "plant-based" products, making them appear more desirable. Arsenic binds with thiols and accumulates in keratinized tissues, where it can have severe toxic effects.
This clever marketing has positioned these products favorably within the beauty industry, as consumers often perceive them as safer and more natural alternatives to traditional chemical depilatories. However, the potential health risks associated with prolonged exposure to arsenic and sulfides call for greater consumer awareness and regulatory scrutiny to ensure safety standards are met and maintained.
In the literature titled "The Effects of Depilatory Agents as Penetration Enhancers on Human Stratum Corneum Structures," Lee discusses the unique role of depilatory creams containing potassium thioglycolate or calcium thioglycolate as penetration enhancers. Due to the rich disulfide bond content between cysteine groups, hair keratin is structurally robust. The thioglycolate component in depilatories acts to break these disulfide bonds, allowing the weakened hair keratin to be removed through gentle friction.
Interestingly, pretreatment with depilatory agents can significantly enhance the transdermal penetration of drugs like theophylline and even insulin in rats. The effect of enhanced penetration can last for up to one day. This observation suggests that the structural changes induced by depilatory treatment do not fully recover within a one-day window. This has important clinical implications for convenience, as it allows for effective delivery of drugs of interest within this time frame without the need for reapplication.
However, this effect also poses a higher risk for users of depilatory creams to experience increased percutaneous absorption of contact substances. This underscores the need for careful consideration when using these products, especially if users are exposed to other chemicals or drugs that could potentially be absorbed through the skin more readily following depilatory treatment.
The article from the April 2008 issue of the Journal of Investigative Dermatology, titled "The Effects of Depilatory Agents as Penetration Enhancers on Human Stratum Corneum Structures," details an ex vivo study aimed at characterizing the effects of depilatory agents on transdermal drug delivery and associated structural changes. In this study, fresh human skin was treated with depilatory cream for 10 minutes, followed by penetration testing using fluorescent model drugs. The penetration of these drugs was then imaged and quantified.
Various advanced imaging techniques were employed in the study, including multiphoton imaging, histology, Nile red staining, and electron microscopy, to observe changes in the structure of the stratum corneum. The results indicated an enhanced penetration capability for both hydrophilic and lipophilic model drugs through the stratum corneum. Multiphoton imaging revealed disruptions in cellular integrity and focal detachment of superficial corneocytes. Nile red staining showed disordered lipid distribution, and ultrastructural analysis revealed that the intracellular keratin matrix, protein envelopes, and regular lamellar intercellular lipid layers were disrupted.
These structural changes within and between cells are significant because they indicate that depilatory agents can enhance transdermal drug delivery by reducing the resistance of both transcellular and intercellular pathways in the stratum corneum. They weaken the adhesion between corneocytes and induce changes in the intracellular structures of the stratum corneum. This weakening of the skin's barrier function can increase the risk of hypersensitivity reactions to exogenous chemical exposures on depilated skin, especially for individuals who frequently use depilatory creams.
The study also suggests that while depilatory creams can enhance the penetration of drugs, they could also facilitate the penetration of exogenous toxic substances into the skin. The duration of this enhanced permeability window after a single use of depilatory cream has not been precisely determined in vivo for human skin. However, repeated use could potentially increase the risk of penetration of toxic substances. This finding highlights the need for caution in the use of depilatory creams, particularly in environments where individuals may be exposed to harmful chemicals.
The study titled "Depilatory creams increase the number of hair follicles, and dermal fibroblasts expressing interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and tumor necrosis factor-β in mouse skin" conducted tests on two commercially available brands of depilatory creams containing calcium thioglycolate on the dorsal skin of mice. This research aimed to evaluate the skin's response over both short-term (three days and one week) and long-term (two weeks) periods following application.
The findings revealed that the use of depilatory creams led to an increase in the number of dermal fibroblasts and hair follicles (HFs), as well as elevated levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and tumor necrosis factor-β (TNF-β). IL-6 is an inflammatory cytokine involved in the inflammatory response following skin injury, and the induction of TNF-α expression helps in the initiation and growth of hair follicles. Interestingly, TNF-α levels are also elevated during the growth phase induced by non-ablative fractional laser treatment used for cardiac regeneration during periods of transient moderate inflammation.
These results indicate that depilatory creams can cause mild inflammation and that IL-6 may mediate the induced growth of hair follicles, potentially negatively affecting the skin. This mild inflammation can result in increased skin sensitivity and other dermatological reactions. Additionally, the study sheds light on the biochemical processes induced by chemical depilatories that not only remove hair but also impact the skin's cellular structure and inflammatory status. This underscores the need for cautious use of such products, considering their potential to alter skin health and function.
Since the widespread use of depilatory creams, there have been numerous case reports on the internet about dermatologists treating patients who have suffered skin damage due to the use of these cosmetic hair removal products. One such case involved a female college student who, self-conscious about the density of hair on her legs and arms and its impact on her appearance, began using depilatory cream daily before going out. This led to severe skin erosion on her arms. Although the student's arms eventually healed with medical treatment, the areas where the depilatory cream had been applied were left with extensive scarring.
This incident highlights the risks associated with the use of chemical depilatories, especially when used frequently or without proper precautions. Depilatory creams work by breaking down the protein structure of hair, which can also affect the surrounding skin, particularly if left on for too long or used too often. This can lead to various skin issues, ranging from mild irritation and redness to severe chemical burns and permanent scarring.
The desire for aesthetic improvement through the use of depilatory creams must be balanced with an awareness of the potential harm they can cause to delicate skin. It is essential for users to follow product instructions carefully, perform patch tests to check for adverse reactions before widespread use, and consider less aggressive methods of hair removal if they have sensitive skin. Additionally, consulting with a dermatologist before starting any new skin treatment regimen is advisable to minimize risks and ensure skin health.
The case reported in 2020 by the Pandit B.D Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, India, titled "Unilateral Koilonychia Secondary to Chemical Depilatory Product," highlights a unique instance of nail damage due to chemical exposure from a depilatory product. A 24-year-old male immersed his right hand in water dissolved with a locally available depilatory soap, stirring for 15 minutes. Following this exposure, he observed that the distal edges of his right-hand fingernails turned pale yellow. The nails exhibited a spoon-like concavity (koilonychia), thinning, and indentation of the nail plates. The keratin layer of the right-hand fingernails was rough, and there were visible longitudinal red streaks indicative of splinter hemorrhages. There was mild scaling near the proximal nail fold and white discoloration along the boundary of the proximal edge of the nails. Examination of the left-hand nails was normal, as were the rest of the skin and systemic examinations.
The sudden appearance of koilonychia after dissolving the chemical depilatory soap for 15 minutes and the unilateral manifestation on the hand used to dissolve the chemical highlight the irritative nature of the chemical substances involved. Consequently, the diagnosis was unilateral koilonychia secondary to irritant contact dermatitis from a chemical depilatory product.
The hypothesis for the occurrence of such symptoms can be attributed to the similarity in the type of hard keratin present in both hair and nails-KRT31-34 (Type 1) and KRT81-84 (Type 2). These keratins in hair and nails have more sulfur in their head and tail domains compared to epithelial keratins, allowing for tighter cross-linking through disulfide bonds. Thus, both hair and nails are susceptible targets for chemical depilatories, which may dissolve nails by disrupting the sulfur-rich disulfide bonds in the keratin.
Alanko and others have reported instances where hairdressers using ammonium thioglycolate for permanent hair treatments also experienced fingertip pain and spoon nails, though without associated dermatitis. A second hypothesis could be that prolonged contact with the alkaline substances in chemical depilatory products can cause nails to become thinner and softer, making them more susceptible to deformation. This case emphasizes the need for caution and protective measures when handling potent chemical agents, even those commonly used in cosmetic products.
The cases and reports mentioned highlight significant concerns regarding various hair removal products available in the market and their potential harm to human health. In the cosmetics market, products advertised with claims such as "pure plant hair removal," "permanent hair removal," and "one-time hair removal" can be confusing and sometimes misleading, with counterfeit and substandard products lurking among them. Ordinary consumers often struggle to differentiate between good and bad quality products, leading to adverse reactions like redness, swelling, and spots due to the use of inferior depilatory creams.
Authoritative doctors and experts assert that no hair removal cosmetic can achieve permanent hair removal and that purely plant-based depilatory creams have not yet been developed. Consumers should be wary of believing misleading advertisements. Substandard depilatory creams, with their complex compositions, can easily damage the skin, and even qualified creams can cause harm if not used properly.
Regarding the notion that depilatory creams might be carcinogenic, it has been a topic of discussion among the public. Professor Yi Jing, Vice President of the Teaching and Popularization Branch of the Chinese Society of Cell Biology and a professor at the Basic Medical College of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, emphasizes that "all chemical components cannot be simply defined as 'good' or 'bad'—the most important aspect is the 'amount' or dosage." Discussing the carcinogenicity and toxicity of substances must include the concept of quantity. Carcinogens are everywhere, and whether a substance causes cancer depends closely on the amount of exposure, duration, and method of contact. If used briefly on the skin, the human body absorbs very little, and its toxic effects may be negligible. However, prolonged and extensive use cannot guarantee that carcinogenic effects will not occur.
To date, all chemical depilatories irritate the skin to varying degrees, and the concentration of the depilatory agent and the pH level in the product determine the intensity of the irritation. Frequent users or individuals with sensitive skin may experience local skin inflammation, allergies, coarser hair regrowth, and even rashes or skin erosion. Therefore, it is advisable to use depilatory creams sparingly, especially for adolescent girls who are at a physiological turning point with significant hormonal changes. Increased body hair is not unusual during this phase. If excessive hair is a concern, it is best to consult a professional physician and avoid using depilatory products as much as possible.
ⓒ 2024 TECHTIMES.com All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
